| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Level 4 missions in high sec gives too much reward for too little risk - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ki An Yeah, like the title says. This is a problem, CCP. It messes up the economy and makes the game unbalanced. Move level 4 missions to 0.0 and level 3 missions to low sec. It has the added benefit of boosting low sec. So...
- by Empty Vee - at 2008.08.06 13:21:00
|
2. Nano NERF alternative for all. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: The Mach Edited by: The Mach on 31/07/2008 03:10:06 Edited by: The Mach on 31/07/2008 02:22:07 Damps. Work on a falloff based system. ECM. Work on a falloff based system. Seem like nerfed systems that are quite effe...
- by Empty Vee - at 2008.08.02 11:50:00
|
3. Peoples veiws on hi sec piracy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Darth Kasbian on hi sec piracy i take the risk of losing a ship every time i steal ore or loot its the risk i take but i will shoot back Whats your views on hi sec piracy ? When you suicide your ship to Concord, you do...
- by Empty Vee - at 2008.06.19 10:43:00
|
4. What if...the EVE universe was wide open? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tiberius Maddox Edited by: Tiberius Maddox on 22/05/2008 00:28:53 This would be almost certainly impractical, create numerous balance issues, and there is no change it's ever going to happen. That said, what if the EVE u...
- by Empty Vee - at 2008.05.22 12:16:00
|
5. Is Goonswarm wrong to target every Exhumer in Empire for nothing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
just a suggestion: 1) stop mining&selling ice in empire 2) wait 6 weeks 3) form a fleet 4) go to goon space and kill their barges while they have to mine ice for their pos
- by Empty Vee - at 2008.03.03 12:00:00
|
6. A change to the risk reward system of level 3 and 4 missions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Oldgiffer Edited by: Oldgiffer on 18/11/2006 18:41:28 Id like to offer a solution to the current problems with risk and reward in Eve. Some of you may disagree but I think the level 4s agents have always been a major fac...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.11.19 11:29:00
|
7. What % of ice product comes from Macros? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Neveren Edited by: Neveren on 22/10/2006 18:54:06 Edited by: Neveren on 22/10/2006 18:53:20 So im sitting in a 1.0 system mining ice. I need a few million Isotopes to restock pos fuel supplys.. and im wondering if pe...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.10.23 09:25:00
|
8. pray lend me your ears................. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nematode I need some advise. What would i make more isk doing? Mining omber in a Retriever for 2-3 hours, or doing L3 missions for 2-3 hours in my Ferox? I have 56 days to go before i can use a Covetor and make easy cash...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.05.18 12:55:00
|
9. High-sec system POS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Chronus26 Manufacturing arrays and lab moduels are just about the only uses. Is it faster to do research that way? How many research jobs can be installed in one mobile lab? Finally, can all types of research be done (ME...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.05.18 12:37:00
|
10. Black Monolith ?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sir LaunchAlot According to some friends of mine (not sure if they were high on quafe ultra at the time) there should be a "Black Monolith" somewhere in one of the systems. Its referred to also in the movie: 2001 A Space od...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.05.18 12:25:00
|
11. The Truth About Material Efficiency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Raven Aure I think what a number of people are missing here is the principle of a cost-benefit analysis. If the cost of doing an extra level of ME research is going to give you a saving greater than the amount of profit you ...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.05.18 12:04:00
|
12. The Truth About Material Efficiency - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Drizit Edited by: Drizit on 17/05/2006 16:40:16 If you want to waste your isk researching beyond reasonable levels, that's fine. But what you are doing is taking up valuable space in slots that other people could use to ...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.05.18 12:01:00
|
13. What would you like to see in EVE in a years time? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nyphur Nonstatic content. That's all. Stuff that appears in the middle of nowhere and disappears once used, like ancient ruins for archeology, complexes with decent loot such as silos full of minerals (rather than all the is...
- by Empty Vee - at 2006.03.31 11:20:00
|
14. For those saying freighters WOULDN'T ruin the economy. You were wrong - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Futher Bezluden Edited by: Futher Bezluden on 11/08/2005 04:28:31 Rather difficult to stick to a point... Vitamin-R 4TW. back on the freighter traders... people with them will and should trade, that's what the ship is f...
- by Empty Vee - at 2005.08.11 07:10:00
|
15. Everything goes weekend night idea - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And on Monday nights it should by John Lennon Memorial Day, i.e. nobody is allowed to shoot anyone anywhere. Fair trade?
- by Empty Vee - at 2005.08.01 17:31:00
|
16. Increase the gates to 0.0 by 2-3x - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Srewolf Bane Originally by: Lifewire The new chokepoints made PF-346 more boring. If CCP wanted this, ok. People still do not enter 0.0 more and it¦s easy to answer why: they don¦t need to enter 0.0. So from now on t...
- by Empty Vee - at 2005.07.27 22:46:00
|
17. pvp vs carebear - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kael Jorensen Quote: I have said so right in the beginning of this thread. Whatever the changes to 0.0 are .. I will not go there. What is so bad about that? Why fix something that is not broken? No one is asking y...
- by Empty Vee - at 2005.07.27 07:52:00
|
18. pvp vs carebear - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kael Jorensen I agree with alot of the reasons people have provided for why 0.0 is just not appealing to most players. These are just a few of the changes I would try to get people to move out to 0.0. I have said so ri...
- by Empty Vee - at 2005.07.27 07:25:00
|
19. Does Your Char Name Mean Anything? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I guess you can figure it out
- by Empty Vee - at 2005.07.26 14:06:00
|
20. pvp vs carebear - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dreamdancer Man reading the threads it looks like a pro-life vs. pro-choice rally. Whaaaa I am not getting any defenseless ships to shoot at. Whaaa I can't get access to the high end ore cause I might lose my defenseless s...
- by Empty Vee - at 2005.07.26 13:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |